From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitehead v. Rozum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-220J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 09-220J

09-17-2012

CARL WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff, v. GERALD ROZUM; ETAL., Defendants.


Judge Kim R. Gibson/

Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy


ORDER

AND NOW, this 14th day OF September, 2012, a Complaint having been filed in this matter [ECF No. 3], and Defendants having filed a Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 139] pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, to which Plaintiff responded, [ECF No. 158], the Magistrate Judge recommended in a Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 164] that Defendant's Motion be granted. Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation were due on August 31, 2012, and none were filed.

Upon independent review of the record, including the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 164], which is adopted as the opinion of this Court, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF No. 139] is GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that the Clerk of this Court mark this matter closed.

_______________

Kim R. Gibson

United States District Judge
cc: Attorneys of Record via CM-ECF

Carl Whitehead

EK 5805

SCI Somerset

1600 Walters Mill Road

Somerset, PA 15510


Summaries of

Whitehead v. Rozum

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Sep 17, 2012
Civil Action No. 09-220J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2012)
Case details for

Whitehead v. Rozum

Case Details

Full title:CARL WHITEHEAD, Plaintiff, v. GERALD ROZUM; ETAL., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Sep 17, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 09-220J (W.D. Pa. Sep. 17, 2012)