From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitefield v. Greenwalt

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 15, 2022
Civil 22-154 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 15, 2022)

Opinion

Civil 22-154

11-15-2022

ALFRED WHITEFIELD Plaintiff, v. CRYSTAL GREENAWALT, MR. ANKROM, MINDY ANDRETTI, MICHAEL ZAKEN, SGT. STRECHLY, and JOHN DOES 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, Defendants.


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Marilyn J. Horan United States District Court Judge

On January 26, 2022, Andrew Whitefield filed this pro se action alleging that prison officials improperly withheld access to his legal materials and placed him in the Restricted Housing Unit under false pretenses. This case was referred to Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Local Civil Rules 72.C and D. Magistrate Judge Kelly issued an Order on September 20, 2022, recommending that Mr. Whitefield's Motion for Summary Judgment be denied. ECF No. 51. Mr. Whitefield had until October 7, 2022 to file Objections to the Report and Recommendation. Mr. Whitefield did not file Objections. After de novo review of the pleadings and the documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 15th day of November 2022, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

The Report and Recommendation (ECF No.51) filed on September 20, 2022, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Whitefield's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 39) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Whitefield v. Greenwalt

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Nov 15, 2022
Civil 22-154 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 15, 2022)
Case details for

Whitefield v. Greenwalt

Case Details

Full title:ALFRED WHITEFIELD Plaintiff, v. CRYSTAL GREENAWALT, MR. ANKROM, MINDY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Nov 15, 2022

Citations

Civil 22-154 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 15, 2022)