From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whited v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 17, 2008
255 S.W.3d 529 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. ED 90134.

June 17, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Francois County, 05SF-CC00006, Sandra Martinez, Judge.

Scott Thompson, Saint Louis, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Anna L. Bunch Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before ROY L. RICHTER, P.J., CLIFFORD H. AHRENS, J. and GLENN A. NORTON, J.

Prior report: 144 S.W.3d 315.



ORDER


William Whited appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Whited argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to investigate and call a witness. The motion court's findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous.

All references to Rules are to Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2008).

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Whited v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District
Jun 17, 2008
255 S.W.3d 529 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Whited v. State

Case Details

Full title:William WHITED, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District

Date published: Jun 17, 2008

Citations

255 S.W.3d 529 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008)