From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 19, 2005
2:02-cv-02071-GEB-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2005)

Opinion

2:02-cv-02071-GEB-KJM-P.

September 19, 2005


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 20, 2005, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. On August 2, 2005 and September 2, 2005, petitioner was granted an additional thirty days to file objections. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 20, 2005, are adopted in full; and

2. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is denied.


Summaries of

White v. Yates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 19, 2005
2:02-cv-02071-GEB-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2005)
Case details for

White v. Yates

Case Details

Full title:DENNIS ROY WHITE, Petitioner, v. JAMES A. YATES, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 19, 2005

Citations

2:02-cv-02071-GEB-KJM-P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2005)