From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Workman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jan 18, 2012
No. CIV 12-001-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Jan. 18, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV 12-001-RAW-KEW

01-18-2012

RICKEY WHITE, Petitioner, v. RANDALL WORKMAN, Warden, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER

DENYING CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

On January 12, 2012, the court dismissed petitioner's successive petition for a writ of habeas corpus for lack of jurisdiction. After careful review of the record, the court concludes petitioner has not shown "at least, that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether [this] court was correct in its procedural ruling." Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). See also 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c).

Accordingly, petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. See Rule 11(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.

_________________

RONALD A. WHITE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

White v. Workman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jan 18, 2012
No. CIV 12-001-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Jan. 18, 2012)
Case details for

White v. Workman

Case Details

Full title:RICKEY WHITE, Petitioner, v. RANDALL WORKMAN, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Jan 18, 2012

Citations

No. CIV 12-001-RAW-KEW (E.D. Okla. Jan. 18, 2012)