From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Trapp

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 11, 2006
Case No. 02-71710 (E.D. Mich. May. 11, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 02-71710.

May 11, 2006


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF APRIL 13, 2006 ORDER


I.

On April 13, 2006 the Court entered an order dismissing Marjorie VanOchten as a defendant. Plaintiff has moved for reconsideration of the order. The motion is DENIED. L.R. 7.1(g) provides that for the Court to reconsider a decision a palpable defect must be demonstrated by which the Court and the parties have been misled and that correcting the defect will result in a different disposition. Plaintiff has not shown that Ms. VanOchten was involved in plaintiff's removal from the legal writing program, or that she was involved in allowing Caucasians to be treated differently than plaintiff with regard to the program.

II.

At the May 23, 2006 final pretrial conference plaintiff shall identify with particularity any discovery requests to which defendants have not responded.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

White v. Trapp

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 11, 2006
Case No. 02-71710 (E.D. Mich. May. 11, 2006)
Case details for

White v. Trapp

Case Details

Full title:ALLAN WHITE, Plaintiff, v. HARRY TRAPP and TOM PHILLIPS, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: May 11, 2006

Citations

Case No. 02-71710 (E.D. Mich. May. 11, 2006)