From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Jun 17, 2013
No. 13-2173-JDT/tmp (W.D. Tenn. Jun. 17, 2013)

Opinion

No. 13-2173-JDT/tmp

06-17-2013

JUDY WHITE and GARY WHITE, Plaintiffs, v. DELORES STEPHENS, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR EX PARTE RELIEF

Plaintiffs filed this complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and paid the filing fee. Along with the complaint, they filed a motion for ex parte emergency relief [DE# 3]. On April 15, 2013, they filed a renewed ex parte motion for emergency relief [DE# 35]. The motions were referred to Magistrate Judge Tu M. Pham for a report and recommendation.

Magistrate Judge Pham has issued his report, recommending that Plaintiffs' motions be denied [DE# 41]. Plaintiffs have not filed any objections. Therefore, the report and recommendation of Magistrate Judge Pham is hereby ADOPTED, and Plaintiffs' motions for ex parte emergency relief are DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

JAMES D. TODD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

White v. Stephens

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
Jun 17, 2013
No. 13-2173-JDT/tmp (W.D. Tenn. Jun. 17, 2013)
Case details for

White v. Stephens

Case Details

Full title:JUDY WHITE and GARY WHITE, Plaintiffs, v. DELORES STEPHENS, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Date published: Jun 17, 2013

Citations

No. 13-2173-JDT/tmp (W.D. Tenn. Jun. 17, 2013)