From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 17, 1992
592 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Opinion

No. 90-625.

January 17, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Thomas S. Kirk, J.

James A. Sawyer, Jr., Orlando, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


Bernice White appeals a final order finding her in contempt. The contempt proceedings stem from White's alleged failure to abide by court orders entered in the delinquency cases of two brothers. Upon adjudicating the boys delinquent, the trial court entered a detention order for each child and noted at the bottom of each order in handwriting "HRS to Staff." White contends that the contempt finding was improper as there was no evidence that the order which she allegedly failed to obey was directed to her, that she had notice of the underlying order or that she willfully disobeyed the order. We agree and reverse.

After careful review of the record, we conclude that the notation at the bottom of the detention order at best may be considered to be an order directed to HRS. Nothing in the order or in the record indicates that White personally was ordered to do anything. Accordingly, the order finding her in contempt is reversed.

REVERSED.

GOSHORN, C.J., and PETERSON and DIAMANTIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

White v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jan 17, 1992
592 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)
Case details for

White v. State

Case Details

Full title:BERNICE WHITE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jan 17, 1992

Citations

592 So. 2d 1184 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

M.J. v. State

Smith, 954 So.2d at 1194 (citing Barnes v. State, 588 So.2d 1076, 1077 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991) ). There must be…

Knorr v. Knorr

Further, a party may be held in contempt only if he has willfully disobeyed a directive of which he has been…