Opinion
Nos. 05-05-01506-CR, 05-05-01507-CR, 05-05-01508-CR, 05-05-01509-CR, 05-05-01510-CR, 05-05-01511-CR, 05-05-01512-CR, 05-05-01513-CR, 05-05-01514-CR, 05-05-01515-CR, 05-05-01516-CR
Opinion issued February 16, 2006. DO NOT PUBLISH. Tex.R.App.P. 47.
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas, Trial Court Cause Nos. F05-21185-U, F05-25808-VU, F05-25809-VU, F05-25963-KU, F05-25993-U, F05-25994-IU, F05-25995-IU, F05-26001-IU, F05-26002-IU, F05-26003-IU, F04-73956-QU. Dismissed.
Before Justices RICHTER, LANG, and MAZZANT.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
David Ray White pleaded guilty to possession of methamphetamine in an amount of one gram or more but less than four grams; four forgery offenses; three possession of fraudulent identification offenses; possession of methamphetamine in an amount less than one gram; forgery of a government instrument; and unauthorized use of a motor vehicle. In the possession of methamphetamine over one gram case, the judge sentenced appellant to five years' imprisonment. In the possession of methamphetamine less than one gram case, the judge sentenced appellant to two years' confinement in a state jail. In the forgery of a government instrument case, the judge sentenced appellant to ten years' imprisonment. In the remaining cases, the judge assessed punishment, enhanced by two prior state jail felony convictions, at ten years' imprisonment. In each case, the judge assessed a $1000 fine. The judge ordered the sentence in the possession of methamphetamine over one gram case to be served consecutively to the remaining sentences. Sentence was imposed in each case on August 12, 2005 and no motions for new trial were filed. Therefore, appellant's notices of appeal were due by Monday, September 12, 2005. See Tex.R.App.P. 26.2(a)(1). Appellant's October 10, 2005 notices of appeal are untimely, leaving us without jurisdiction over the appeals. See Slaton v. State, 981 S.W.2d 208, 210 (Tex.Crim.App. 1998) (per curiam); Boyd v. State, 971 S.W.2d 603, 605-06 (Tex.App.-Dallas 1998, no pet.). We dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.