From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Nov 5, 2002
90 S.W.3d 498 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Opinion

No. ED 80474

November 5, 2002

Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Louis County; Steven Goldman, Judge.

Douglas R. Hoff, Assistant State Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Shaun J. Mackelprang, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Paul J. Simon, P.J., Gary M. Gaertner, Sr., J. and Kathianne Knaup Crane, J.



ORDER


Movant, Cornell White, appeals from the judgment denying on the merits his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

White v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two
Nov 5, 2002
90 S.W.3d 498 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)
Case details for

White v. State

Case Details

Full title:Cornell White, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Two

Date published: Nov 5, 2002

Citations

90 S.W.3d 498 (Mo. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

White v. Kemna

Exh. K), and this decision was affirmed on appeal on November 5, 2002. White v. State, 90 S.W.3d 498…

White v. State

On remand, the motion court issued supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law and again denied…