From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Mar 1, 2011
331 S.W.3d 742 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Opinion

No. WD71442.

March 1, 2011.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Carroll County, David L. Busch, Judge.

Mark A. Grothoff, Esq., Columbia, MO, for appellant.

Shaun J. Mackelprang, Esq., John M. Reeves, Esq., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before: JOSEPH M. ELLIS, P.J., and ALOK AHUJA and KAREN KING MITCHELL, JJ.


ORDER


Brandon White was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of delivery of a controlled substance near schools and sentenced to two fifteen-year terms of imprisonment, to be served concurrently. In this post-conviction relief proceeding brought pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.15, White argues that his attorney provided ineffective assistance by failing to cross-examine two of the State's witnesses concerning an agreement between the State's principal fact witness and prosecutors concerning the disposition of charges pending against the witness. White also argues that the State unlawfully failed to disclose the agreement. The circuit court denied relief following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

White v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
Mar 1, 2011
331 S.W.3d 742 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)
Case details for

White v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brandon A. WHITE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: Mar 1, 2011

Citations

331 S.W.3d 742 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011)

Citing Cases

State v. Hicks

See, e.g., State v. Avery, 275 S.W.3d 231, 232 (Mo. banc 2009) ("The two convictions resulted in concurrent…