From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 10, 1988
758 S.W.2d 705 (Ark. 1988)

Opinion

No. RC 88-37

Opinion delivered October 10, 1988

APPEAL ERROR — MOTION FOR RULE ON THE CLERK — A RECORD NOT PREPARED BY A CERTIFIED COURT REPORTER WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW UNLESS ALL PARTIES AGREE IT IS ACCURATE AND THE MISTAKE WILL NOT BE REPEATED. — Where a record is presented that has not been prepared by a certified court reporter, review will not be allowed unless all parties agree the record is accurate and the mistake will not be repeated.

Motion for rule on the clerk; denied without prejudice.

Wilson Associates, P.A., by: Ronald C. Wilson, for appellant.

No objection.


It has been our practice when a record is presented, which has not been prepared by a certified court reporter, to not allow review unless two things are done. First, all parties agree the record is accurate. Second, the mistake will not be repeated.

The first condition has been satisfied. If the trial judge will write our clerk noting that in the future his regular certified court reporter will record all such juvenile cases in the future, we will accept the record.


Summaries of

White v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas
Oct 10, 1988
758 S.W.2d 705 (Ark. 1988)
Case details for

White v. State

Case Details

Full title:James Elgin WHITE v. STATE of Arkansas

Court:Supreme Court of Arkansas

Date published: Oct 10, 1988

Citations

758 S.W.2d 705 (Ark. 1988)
758 S.W.2d 705