White v. Stacher

31 Citing cases

  1. Hunter v. McIntosh

    Civil Action 8:23-cv-2916 (D.S.C. Aug. 4, 2023)

    , this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation.” White v. Stacher, C/A No. 6-05-1737-GRA-WMC, 2005 WL 8163324, at *1 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2005) (citing Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1983)).

  2. Pierce v. Clements Elec.

    Civil Action 8:22-cv-175-TMC (D.S.C. Mar. 7, 2022)

    However, “[i]n the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation.” White v. Stacher, C/A No. 6-05-1737-GRA-WMC, 2005 WL 8163324, at *1 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2005) (citing Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1983)).

  3. Wattleton-Jones v. Hook Sec.

    Civil Action 6:21-cv-04109-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 18, 2022)

    However, “[i]n the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation.” White v. Stacher, C/A No. 6-05-1737-GRA-WMC, 2005 WL 8163324, at *1 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2005) (citing Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1983)).

  4. Sholar v. BHI Energy I Power Servs.

    Civil Action 8:21-cv-2551-TMC (D.S.C. Dec. 8, 2021)

    , this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation.” White v. Stacher, C/A No. 6-05-1737-GRA-WMC, 2005 WL 8163324, at *1 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2005) (citing Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1983))

  5. Shiflet v. BASF Corp.

    Civil Action No. 8:18-cv-3260-TMC (D.S.C. Feb. 9, 2021)

    However, "[i]n the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation." White v. Stacher, C/A No. 6-05-1737-GRA-WMC, 2005 WL 8163324, at *1 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2005) (citing Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1983)). "An objection is specific if it 'enables the district judge to focus attention on those issues—factual and legal—that are at the heart of the parties' dispute.'"

  6. Wakefield v. S.C. Dept. of Corr.

    Civil Action No. 9:20-cv-0977-TMC (D.S.C. Dec. 29, 2020)

    However, "[i]n the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation." White v. Stacher, C/A No. 6-05-1737-GRA-WMC, 2005 WL 8163324, at *1 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2005) (citing Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1983)). It is well established that a court has the authority to dismiss a case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute or failure to comply with orders of the court.

  7. Curry v. Cannon

    Case No. 0:20-cv-2374-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2020)   Cited 1 times

    However, "[i]n the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation." White v. Stacher, C/A No. 6-05-1737-GRA-WMC, 2005 WL 8163324, at *1 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2005) (citing Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1983)). Having reviewed the Report and finding no clear error, the court agrees with, and wholly adopts, the magistrate judge's conclusions and recommendations in the Report (ECF No. 15), which are incorporated herein by reference.

  8. Curry v. Crockett

    Case No. 2:20-cv-2343-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 27, 2020)   Cited 1 times

    However, "[i]n the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation." White v. Stacher, C/A No. 6-05-1737-GRA-WMC, 2005 WL 8163324, at *1 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2005) (citing Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1983)). Having reviewed the Report and finding no clear error, the court agrees with, and wholly adopts, the magistrate judge's conclusions and recommendations in the Report (ECF No. 15), which are incorporated herein by reference.

  9. Blasco v. South Carolina

    Civil Action No. 6:20-cv-1573-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 6, 2020)

    However, "[i]n the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation." White v. Stacher, C/A No. 6-05-1737-GRA-WMC, 2005 WL 8163324, at *1 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2005) (citing Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1983)). Thus, having reviewed the Report and finding no clear error, the court agrees with, and wholly adopts, the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations in the Report (ECF No. 24), which is incorporated herein by reference.

  10. Morrison v. S.C.D.C.

    Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-2171-TMC (D.S.C. Oct. 5, 2020)

    However, "[i]n the absence of specific objections to the Report and Recommendation, this Court is not required to give any explanation for adopting the recommendation." White v. Stacher, C/A No. 6-05-1737-GRA-WMC, 2005 WL 8163324, at *1 (D.S.C. Aug. 29, 2005) (citing Camby v. Davis, 718 F.2d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1983)). Thus, having reviewed the Report and without objection from Plaintiff, the court agrees with and adopts, the magistrate judge's findings in the Report (ECF No. 72), which are incorporated herein by reference.