From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
May 23, 1995
898 S.W.2d 138 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. WD 49489.

May 23, 1995.

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, CASS COUNTY; THOMAS M. CAMPBELL, JUDGE.

Eddie G. Dougherty, Kansas City, for appellants.

Charles S. Weedman, Jr., Harrisonville, for respondents.

Before KENNEDY, P.J., and SMART and LAURA DENVIR STITH, JJ.


ORDER


Lark Smith and John Robertson appeal from a judgment entered against them and in favor of Kenneth White and Alma Jo White. Defendants contend on appeal: 1) that the court erred in failing to make findings of fact and conclusions of law in accordance with Rule 73.01; 2) that the trial court abused its discretion in permitting testimony as to lost income which went beyond plaintiffs' interrogatory answers; 3) that the court erred in denying leave to amend their answer to deny an agency relationship between the defendants; and 4) that the judgment is not supported by substantial evidence of a causal relationship between the vehicular collision in question and the injuries of plaintiff Kenneth White.

The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

White v. Smith

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District
May 23, 1995
898 S.W.2d 138 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

White v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:KENNETH D. AND ALMA JO WHITE, RESPONDENTS, v. LARK E. SMITH AND JOHN E…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District

Date published: May 23, 1995

Citations

898 S.W.2d 138 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Kruse v. Karlen

Fictitious citation using a real case name See White v. Smith, 73 S.W. 610 (Mo. 1903); White v. …