From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Sinclair

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jan 15, 2021
No. 3:20-CV-5141-RSM-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 15, 2021)

Opinion

No. 3:20-CV-5141-RSM-DWC

01-15-2021

JOEL WHITE, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN SINCLAIR, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court, having reviewed the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge David W. Christel, and the remaining record, does hereby find and ORDER:

(1) The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation.

(2) Plaintiff failed to state claims of retaliation, equal protection violations, or due process violations. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion," Dkt. 30) is granted and Plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Second Amended Complaint ("Motion to Amend," Dkt. 34) is denied.

(3) The Clerk is directed to send copies of this Order to Plaintiff, counsel for Defendants, and to the Hon. David W. Christel.

DATED this 15th day of January, 2021.

/s/_________

RICARDO S. MARTINEZ

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

White v. Sinclair

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA
Jan 15, 2021
No. 3:20-CV-5141-RSM-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 15, 2021)
Case details for

White v. Sinclair

Case Details

Full title:JOEL WHITE, Plaintiff, v. STEPHEN SINCLAIR, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA

Date published: Jan 15, 2021

Citations

No. 3:20-CV-5141-RSM-DWC (W.D. Wash. Jan. 15, 2021)