From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Rozum

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 9, 2007
Case No. 3:06-cv-244-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 9, 2007)

Opinion

Case No. 3:06-cv-244-KRG-KAP.

October 9, 2007


MEMORANDUM ORDER


This matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and subsections 3 and 4 of Local Rule 72.1 for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on September 20, 2007, docket no. 41, recommending that summary judgment be entered in favor of the defendants.

The parties were given notice that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), they had ten days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's notice was sent by United States mail to his last address of record and was returned as undeliverable. Plaintiff has not notified the Clerk of his new address. The time to file objections has expired.

After review of the record of this matter and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 9th day of October, 2007, it is

ORDERED that defendants' motion for summary judgment, docket no. 32, is granted; plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, docket no. 38, is denied. Judgment is entered for the defendants. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. If plaintiff contacts the Clerk, the Clerk shall provide the plaintiff with a copy of this order. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.


Summaries of

White v. Rozum

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 9, 2007
Case No. 3:06-cv-244-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 9, 2007)
Case details for

White v. Rozum

Case Details

Full title:DARRIN WHITE, Plaintiff v. GERALD ROZUM, ROBERT SNYDER, ALLEN JOSEPH…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 9, 2007

Citations

Case No. 3:06-cv-244-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Oct. 9, 2007)