From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Rasmussen

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2007
2:07-cv-1341-GEB-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2007)

Opinion

2:07-cv-1341-GEB-JFM-P.

August 30, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 25, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 25, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

White v. Rasmussen

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 30, 2007
2:07-cv-1341-GEB-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2007)
Case details for

White v. Rasmussen

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD ANDREW WHITE, Plaintiff, v. C/O RASMUSSEN, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 30, 2007

Citations

2:07-cv-1341-GEB-JFM-P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 30, 2007)