From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Quintana

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 1, 2022
5:22-cv-00150-FLA (PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)

Opinion

5:22-cv-00150-FLA (PVCx)

11-01-2022

ANTHONY JEROME WHITE, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden,[1] Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FERNANDO L. AENLLE-ROCHA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed the Petition, Respondent's Motion to Dismiss, all the records and files herein, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and Petitioner's Objections. After having made a de novo determination of the portions of the Report and Recommendation to which Objections were directed, the court concurs with and accepts the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge, with the following amendment: the typographical error in footnote 1, page 1 is corrected to read “where Petitioner is currently housed.”

IT IS ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss is granted. The Petition is denied and Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and the Judgment herein on Petitioner and counsel for Respondent.

LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.


Summaries of

White v. Quintana

United States District Court, Central District of California
Nov 1, 2022
5:22-cv-00150-FLA (PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)
Case details for

White v. Quintana

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY JEROME WHITE, Petitioner, v. FRANCISCO J. QUINTANA, Warden,[1…

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Nov 1, 2022

Citations

5:22-cv-00150-FLA (PVCx) (C.D. Cal. Nov. 1, 2022)