From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Pollard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 10, 2020
Case No. 2:18-cv-05057-JFW-AFM (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2020)

Opinion

Case No. 2:18-cv-05057-JFW-AFM

03-10-2020

LAMAR WHITE, Petitioner, v. MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, records on file and the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that Judgment be entered (1) denying the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus; and (2) dismissing the action with prejudice. DATED: March 10, 2020

/s/_________

JOHN F. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

White v. Pollard

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 10, 2020
Case No. 2:18-cv-05057-JFW-AFM (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2020)
Case details for

White v. Pollard

Case Details

Full title:LAMAR WHITE, Petitioner, v. MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 10, 2020

Citations

Case No. 2:18-cv-05057-JFW-AFM (C.D. Cal. Mar. 10, 2020)