From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 2007
41 A.D.3d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2007-02520.

June 26, 2007.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition, inter alia, to bar the People from relitigating certain matters previously determined in a proceeding in the Supreme Court, Kings County, entitled People v White under indictment No. 3821/06, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, New York, N.Y.

(Michael J. Keane of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Florio, J.P., Fisher, Carni and McCarthy, JJ.


Ordered that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

This Court does not have original subject matter jurisdiction to entertain this proceeding, as no "justice of the supreme court or . . . judge of [the] county court or the court of general sessions" was named as a respondent (CPLR 506 [b] [1]). Since subject matter jurisdiction cannot be waived, the proceeding must be dismissed ( see Matter of Nolan v Lungen, 61 NY2d 788 ; CPLR 7804 [b]; cf. Matter of Law Offs. of Andrew F. Capoccia v Spitzer, 270 AD2d 643, 644 n 2 [2000])


Summaries of

White v. People

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 2007
41 A.D.3d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

White v. People

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GREGORY WHITE, Petitioner, v. PEOPLE OF STATE OF NEW YORK…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 26, 2007

Citations

41 A.D.3d 860 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
837 N.Y.S.2d 590

Citing Cases

White v. People

Decided October 11, 2007. Appeal from the 2d Dept: 41 AD3d 860. Motions for Leave to Appeal…

People v. Alexander

individual who has been released on parole is not sufficiently restrained of his or her liberty so as to be…