From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Pennsylvania State Police

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 15, 2012
Civil Action No. 10-0464 (W.D. Pa. May. 15, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 10-0464

05-15-2012

LANCE M. WHITE, SR. Plaintiff, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, et al., Defendants.


District Judge Donetta W. Ambrose

Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy


MEMORANDUM ORDER

On April 9, 2010, Lance White filed a civil rights complaint seeking compensatory damages and release from custody pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, against numerous named Pennsylvania State Troopers, the Governor of Pennsylvania and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office, the Butler County Public Defenders Office, and other unnamed Pennsylvania State Troopers and employees, alleging that he is a state prisoner whose constitutional rights were violated when he was falsely arrested and then falsely prosecuted, convicted and sentenced for narcotics offenses in Pennsylvania. The case was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the local rules of court.

On April 25,2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 42] recommending that Plaintiffs case be dismissed with prejudice for failing to comply with numerous court orders and failure to prosecute by failing to provide the Court with proper service documents.

Plaintiff filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation on May 11, 2012 [ECF No. 44]. Plaintiff's Objections do not address the deficiencies in Plaintiff's service instructions and forms and, instead, reiterate the factual underpinnings of his claims on their merits. Defendants have yet to be served because of Plaintiff's refusal or inability to comply with numerous court orders directing him to file the requisite service instructions and forms, and his objections do nothing to undermine the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, and the Objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2012,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF. No. 42] dated April 25, 2012, recommending that Plaintiffs case be dismissed with prejudice for failing to comply with numerous court orders and failure to prosecute by failing to provide the Court with proper service documents, is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court. This case is therefore DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

___________

Donetta W. Ambrose

United States District Judge
cc:

Lance M. White, Sr., Pro Se

JA-8797

1 Kelley Drive

Coal Township, PA 17866


Summaries of

White v. Pennsylvania State Police

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
May 15, 2012
Civil Action No. 10-0464 (W.D. Pa. May. 15, 2012)
Case details for

White v. Pennsylvania State Police

Case Details

Full title:LANCE M. WHITE, SR. Plaintiff, v. THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, et al.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: May 15, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 10-0464 (W.D. Pa. May. 15, 2012)