(December Term, 1833.)
Iredell for the plaintiff.
Badger for the defendant.
— As the statement of these two cases in the record represents that the same evidence and instructions of the Court were given in these as in White v. White, ante 257, there must be a new trial in these cases for the reasons upon which it was granted in the other.
Full title:JACOB WHITE'S ADMINISTRATOR v. DAVID WHITE. JACOB WHITE'S ADMINISTRATOR v…
Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina
Date published: Dec 1, 1833
" (Citing authorities.) See also to the same purport: Humble Oil Refining Co. v. Michiels, 2 La. App. 337,…
Martin v. PribilWithout quoting from the reasoning of the courts, we shall set forth the gist of the holdings in several of…