From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1993
197 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

October 1, 1993

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Herkimer County, Tenney, J.

Present — Callahan, J.P., Pine, Lawton, Boomer and Davis, JJ.


Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, motion granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: The court erred in denying defendant's motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff was injured when, after swimming with friends at about 3:00 in the morning, she came upon an eight-foot chain link fence while attempting to return to her car. That fence was part of defendant's Beardslee hydroelectric station. She climbed the fence and walked along a cement path until she came to a second fence, which was 10 feet high with barbed wire across the top. As she was climbing it, she grabbed a high voltage lead line to help pull herself up, whereupon she received an electric shock and fell to the ground.

Defendant met its burden of establishing as a matter of law that it maintained its facility with reasonable care by installing two fences enclosing the lead line at issue (see, Miner v. Long Is. Light. Co., 40 N.Y.2d 372) and plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact in response thereto (see, Friends of Animals v. Associated Fur Mfrs., 46 N.Y.2d 1065).


Summaries of

White v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Oct 1, 1993
197 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

White v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

Case Details

Full title:LOUELLYN WHITE, Respondent, v. NIAGARA MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1993

Citations

197 A.D.2d 906 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
602 N.Y.S.2d 263

Citing Cases

Virtuoso v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.

We affirm. Contrary to plaintiff's contention, defendants met their initial burden on the motion of…

Trapani v. Rochester Gas Corp.

There remains the question of RGE's responsibility. This case cannot be paralleled with White v Niagara…