From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 7, 2013
2013-3179 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2013)

Opinion

2013-3179

11-07-2013

RONNEY L. WHITE, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.


NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT0752130542-I-1.

ON MOTION


ORDER

The United States Postal Service ("USPS") moves to reform the official caption to name the Merit Systems Protection Board ("Board") as the proper respondent.

Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7703(a)(2), the Board is designated as the respondent when the Board's decision concerns the procedure or jurisdiction of the Board. The employing agency is designated as the respondent when the Board reaches the merits of the underlying case. Here, the Board dismissed White's appeal for lack of jurisdiction. Thus, the Board is the proper respondent in this petition for review.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The motion to reform the caption is granted. The revised official caption is reflected above.

FOR THE COURT

______________________

Daniel E. O'Toole

Clerk
s21


Summaries of

White v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Nov 7, 2013
2013-3179 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2013)
Case details for

White v. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd.

Case Details

Full title:RONNEY L. WHITE, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent.

Court:United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Nov 7, 2013

Citations

2013-3179 (Fed. Cir. Nov. 7, 2013)