White v. McKinna

Full title: LARRY WHITE, Petitioner, v. MARK MCKINNA, Supt. F.C.F., JOHN W. SUTHERS…

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Aug 16, 2012

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01194-WYD (D. Colo. Aug. 16, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 06-cv-01194-WYD

08-16-2012

LARRY WHITE, Petitioner, v. MARK MCKINNA, Supt. F.C.F., JOHN W. SUTHERS, The Attorney General State of Colorado, Respondents.

WILEY Y. DANIEL

ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO PROCEED ON APPEAL

PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1915 AND FED. R. APP. P. 24

Daniel, Chief Judge

Petitioner filed pro se a notice of appeal and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [69]. The court has examined the motion and the file and finds that the motion is deficient for the following reasons:

___ is missing affidavit
___ affidavit is incomplete
___ affidavit is not notarized or is not properly notarized
___ affidavit is missing required financial information
___ is missing certified copy of prisoner's trust fund statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding this filing
___ is missing certificate showing current balance in prison account
___ is missing an original signature by the prisoner
X is not on proper form (must use the court's current form)
X other No declaration that the information provided is true and correct

Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, ECF No. 69, is denied without prejudice because the motion is deficient. A new motion may be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to proceed pro se on appeal, ECF No. 70, and the motion for designation on the record, ECF No. 71, are denied as unnecessary.

DATED at Denver, Colorado this 16 day of August, 2012

BY THE COURT:

____________

WILEY Y. DANIEL,

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE