From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 27, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1830 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1830 LKK KJM P.

December 27, 2007


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On October 9, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Petitioner has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 72-304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed October 9, 2007, are adopted in full; and

2. This action is dismissed.


Summaries of

White v. Kramer

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 27, 2007
No. CIV S-07-1830 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2007)
Case details for

White v. Kramer

Case Details

Full title:JACKIE DON WHITE, Petitioner, v. M.C. KRAMER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 27, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1830 LKK KJM P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 27, 2007)