From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 9, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0748 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)

Opinion

No. 2:12-cv-0748 LKK EFB P

07-09-2012

DIWON WHITE, Petitioner, v. RICK HILL, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner is a state prisoner without counsel seeking a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

A petitioner seeking a writ of habeas corpus either must pay the $5.00 filing fee, see 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a), or request leave of court to proceed in forma pauperis, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Petitioner requests leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Dckt. No. 6. However, petitioner has already paid the $5.00 filing fee. Accordingly, his request to proceed in forma pauperis is denied as unnecessary.

So ordered.

_________________

EDMUND F. BRENNAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

White v. Hill

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 9, 2012
No. 2:12-cv-0748 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)
Case details for

White v. Hill

Case Details

Full title:DIWON WHITE, Petitioner, v. RICK HILL, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 9, 2012

Citations

No. 2:12-cv-0748 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Jul. 9, 2012)