Opinion
No. 03:07-CV-1574-AC
09-01-2011
MITCHELL WHITE, Plaintiff, v. GUY HALL; MAX WILLIAMS; MR. THOMPSON, Food Services, TRCI; LIGHTBARN, Food Services, TRCI; MS. WHELAN, Health Services, TRCI; HERNANDEZ, Medical Nurse; and DR. LIDOL, Defendants.
Mitchell White, Pro Se Attorney for Plaintiff Kristin A. Winges-Yanez Andrew D. Hallman Attorneys for Defendants
ORDER
Mitchell White, Pro Se
Attorney for Plaintiff
Kristin A. Winges-Yanez
Andrew D. Hallman
Attorneys for Defendants HERNANDEZ, District Judge:
Magistrate Judge Acosta issued a Findings and Recommendation (#70) on August 17, 2011, in which he recommends that this Court should grant Defendants' motion (#64) for summary judgment against White's remaining claim for violation of his rights to due process, equal protection, and freedom from cruel and unusual punishments. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, I am relieved of my obligation to review the record de novo. United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); see also United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1444 (9th Cir. 1988) (de novo review required only for portions of Magistrate Judge's report to which objections have been made). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, I find no error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Acosta's Findings and Recommendation (#70). Accordingly, Defendants' motion (#64) for summary judgment against White's remaining claim for violation of his rights to due process, equal protection, and freedom from cruel and unusual punishments is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MARCO HERNANDEZ
United States District Judge