Summary
In Hahn, supra at 1037, I noted that Justice CAVANAGH had not included his reason for recusal, but had informed me he would do so in future cases.
Summary of this case from Jordan v. Department of LaborOpinion
Nos. 132191, 132192.
March 7, 2007.
Appeal from the Court of Appeals Nos. 256178, 265087.
Leave to Appeal Denied March 7, 2007.
I concur in the order of denial and note that Justice CAVANAGH has properly supplied to the justices and staff his reason for his decision not to participate in this case because his daughter, Megan Cavanagh, represents the defendant, Robert Hahn. However, in this case, he has not, as required by Const 1963, art 6, § 6, requested that the reason for his decision be included with the order. I further note that Justice CAVANAGH has informed me that in the future he will request that his reasons for not participating be included with his decisions on the orders.
CAVANAGH, J., did not participate.