From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. GC Services Limited Partnership

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 8, 2009
No. 08-11532 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 8, 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-11532.

January 8, 2009


ORDER


For the reasons and under the terms stated on the record on January 8, 2009, Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint [Docket #20] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART.

The Motion is GRANTED insofar as Plaintiffs seek to add as Defendants individual employees of GC Services who had direct communications with any Plaintiff, and as to adding a count of impermissible access under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

The Motion is DENIED insofar as Plaintiffs seek to reinstate state law claims over which Judge Gadola declined supplemental jurisdiction by previous order.

This Order is STAYED pending Judge Murphy's final resolution of any timely objections.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

White v. GC Services Limited Partnership

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jan 8, 2009
No. 08-11532 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 8, 2009)
Case details for

White v. GC Services Limited Partnership

Case Details

Full title:CRYSTAL WHITE, ET.AL., Plaintiffs, v. GC SERVICES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jan 8, 2009

Citations

No. 08-11532 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 8, 2009)