From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. FBI

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 31, 2024
2:23-cv-08457-VBF-AJR (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)

Opinion

2:23-cv-08457-VBF-AJR

01-31-2024

Michael White v. FBI


PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE BAKER FAIRBANK, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

PROCEEDINGS (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE

All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the United States must pay a filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a party's failure to pay the filing fee only if the party is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1).

On December 13, 2023, the Court denied Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis (“Request”) and directed him to pay the full filing fee. (CM/ECF Document 8). The Court warned that if Plaintiff did not comply within 30 days, the case would be dismissed without prejudice. (Id.).

To date, Plaintiff has not paid the filing fee. Accordingly, and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. See, e.g., Roberts v. Soc. Sec. Dep't, 2022 WL 4088755, at *2 (S.D. Cal. Sept. 6, 2022) (action may be dismissed without prejudice where plaintiff fails to establish in forma pauperis status and does not pay the required filing fee).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

White v. FBI

United States District Court, Central District of California
Jan 31, 2024
2:23-cv-08457-VBF-AJR (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)
Case details for

White v. FBI

Case Details

Full title:Michael White v. FBI

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Jan 31, 2024

Citations

2:23-cv-08457-VBF-AJR (C.D. Cal. Jan. 31, 2024)