From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Duff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Mar 20, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17cv207 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2019)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17cv207

03-20-2019

DON RAY WHITE v. MARK DUFF, ET AL.


ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Plaintiff Don Ray White, an inmate at the Polunsky Unit, proceeding pro se, brought the above-styled lawsuit against Mark Duff and Todd Harris.

The court referred this matter to the Honorable Keith F. Giblin, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this court. The Magistrate Judge recommends the defendants' motion to dismiss should be granted and this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

The court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such referral, along with the record and pleadings. Plaintiff filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation. This requires a de novo review of the objections in relation to the pleadings and the applicable law. See FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b).

After careful consideration, the court concludes plaintiff's objections are without merit. Plaintiff does not contest the fact that he has had at least six prior actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous. Additionally, as set forth in the Report, plaintiff has failed to demonstrate he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury at the time he filed his complaint. Accordingly, plaintiff is not allowed to proceed in forma pauperis basis. Accordingly, the defendants' motion to dismiss is proper and the complaint should be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

ORDER

Accordingly, plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. The findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

So ORDERED and SIGNED March 20, 2019.

/s/_________

Ron Clark, Senior District Judge


Summaries of

White v. Duff

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Mar 20, 2019
CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17cv207 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2019)
Case details for

White v. Duff

Case Details

Full title:DON RAY WHITE v. MARK DUFF, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Mar 20, 2019

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 9:17cv207 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 20, 2019)