From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Drozd

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1426 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-08-1426 KJM P.

October 20, 2008


ORDER


By an order filed July 7, 2008, plaintiff was ordered to file an in forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within thirty days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a dismissal of this action. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

White v. Drozd

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 20, 2008
No. CIV S-08-1426 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)
Case details for

White v. Drozd

Case Details

Full title:BERNARD A. WHITE, Plaintiff, v. DALE A. DROZD, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 20, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-08-1426 KJM P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)