From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Doe

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 24, 2024
2:24-cv-107-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 24, 2024)

Opinion

2:24-cv-107-DPM

06-24-2024

LADONTE WHITE PLAINTIFF v. DOE DEFENDANT


ORDER

D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge.

The purpose of White's motion, Doc. 6, is a bit unclear. But the Court construes it as a motion for appointed counsel. That motion is denied without prejudice. This case is young and not yet screened. Plummer v. Grimes, 87 F.3d 1032, 1033 (8th Cir. 1996). The Court reminds White that his amended complaint with more details is due by July 15th. And the Court directs the Clerk to send him another copy of Doc. 4.

So Ordered.


Summaries of

White v. Doe

United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas
Jun 24, 2024
2:24-cv-107-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 24, 2024)
Case details for

White v. Doe

Case Details

Full title:LADONTE WHITE PLAINTIFF v. DOE DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas

Date published: Jun 24, 2024

Citations

2:24-cv-107-DPM (E.D. Ark. Jun. 24, 2024)