From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Aug 1, 2004
358 N.C. 739 (N.C. 2004)

Summary

holding delay of seven months was not prejudicial

Summary of this case from Nicks v. Nicks

Opinion

No. 136P04.

12 August 2004.


ORDER

Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 23rd day of March 2004 by Plaintiff in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:

Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 2004.


Summaries of

White v. Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Aug 1, 2004
358 N.C. 739 (N.C. 2004)

holding delay of seven months was not prejudicial

Summary of this case from Nicks v. Nicks

concluding a four-month delay was not prejudicial

Summary of this case from Sneed v. Johnston (Sneed)
Case details for

White v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:ANNE LITTON WHITE (DAVIS) v. JOHN BLEVINS DAVIS

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Aug 1, 2004

Citations

358 N.C. 739 (N.C. 2004)
603 S.E.2d 127

Citing Cases

Sneed v. Johnston (Sneed)

Since Wall, this Court has addressed delays and concluded reopening the evidence was not warranted, even in…

Nicks v. Nicks

Moreover, the delay here between the close of evidence and entry of judgment was 136 days, or roughly four…