From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jun 4, 2024
8:23-cv-1245-VMC-AAS (M.D. Fla. Jun. 4, 2024)

Opinion

8:23-cv-1245-VMC-AAS

06-04-2024

MANDI WHITE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.


ORDER

VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court upon consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 33), entered on May 20, 2024, recommending that the Plaintiff's Petition for Attorney Fees (Doc. # 32) be granted. No objections have been filed and the time to file objections has expired.

The Court accepts and adopts the Report and Recommendation and grants the Motion.

Discussion

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1); Williams v. Wainwright, 681 F.2d 732 (11th Cir. 1982). In the absence of specific objections, there is no requirement that a district judge review factual findings de novo, Garvey v. Vaughn, 993 F.2d 776, 779 n.9 (11th Cir. 1993), and the court may accept, reject or modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C). If a party files a timely and specific objection to a finding of fact by the magistrate judge, the district court must conduct a de novo review with respect to that factual issue. Stokes v. Singletary, 952 F.2d 1567, 1576 (11th Cir. 1992). The district judge reviews legal conclusions de novo, even in the absence of an objection. See Cooper-Houston v. S. Ry. Co., 37 F.3d 603, 604 (11th Cir. 1994); Castro Bobadilla v. Reno, 826 F.Supp. 1428, 1431-32 (S.D. Fla. 1993), aff'd, 28 F.3d 116 (11th Cir. 1994).

After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions, and recommendations, and giving de novo review to matters of law, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge.

Accordingly, it is now

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED:

(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 33) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED.

(2) Plaintiff's Petition for Attorney Fees (Doc. # 32) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is awarded $3,118.90 in attorney's fees.

(3) The Clerk is directed to enter an amended judgment accordingly.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

White v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Jun 4, 2024
8:23-cv-1245-VMC-AAS (M.D. Fla. Jun. 4, 2024)
Case details for

White v. Comm'r, Soc. Sec. Admin.

Case Details

Full title:MANDI WHITE, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Jun 4, 2024

Citations

8:23-cv-1245-VMC-AAS (M.D. Fla. Jun. 4, 2024)