From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION
Jul 19, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 8:15-01873-MGL-JDA (D.S.C. Jul. 19, 2016)

Summary

noting that "specific reasons are not necessary for dismissing the lay witness's testimony" if he or she simply reiterates the claimant's discredited testimony

Summary of this case from Dawson v. Saul

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 8:15-01873-MGL-JDA

07-19-2016

STACY A. WHITE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND AFFIRMING DEFENDANT'S FINAL DECISION DENYING BENEFITS

This is a Social Security appeal in which Plaintiff seeks judicial review of the final decision of Defendant denying his claim for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB). The matter is before the Court for review of the Report and Recommendation (Report) of the United States Magistrate Judge suggesting to the Court that Defendant's final decision denying Plaintiff's claims for DIB be affirmed.

The Magistrate Judge makes only a recommendation to this Court. The recommendation has no presumptive weight. The responsibility to make a final determination remains with the Court. Mathews v. Weber, 423 U.S. 261, 270 (1976). The Court is charged with making a de novo determination of those portions of the Report to which specific objection is made, and the Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge or recommit the matter with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

The Magistrate Judge filed the Report on June 23, 2016, but Plaintiff neglected to file any objections to the Report. "[I]n the absence of a timely filed objection, a district court need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must 'only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.'" Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005) (quoting Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 advisory committee's note). Moreover, a failure to object waives appellate review. Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985).

After a thorough review of the Report and the record in this case pursuant to the standard set forth above, the Court adopts the Report and incorporates it herein. Therefore, it is the judgment of the Court that Defendant's final decision denying Plaintiff's claims for DIB is AFFIRMED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed this 19th day of July, 2016, in Columbia, South Carolina.

s/ Mary Geiger Lewis

MARY GEIGER LEWIS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

White v. Colvin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION
Jul 19, 2016
CIVIL ACTION NO. 8:15-01873-MGL-JDA (D.S.C. Jul. 19, 2016)

noting that "specific reasons are not necessary for dismissing the lay witness's testimony" if he or she simply reiterates the claimant's discredited testimony

Summary of this case from Dawson v. Saul
Case details for

White v. Colvin

Case Details

Full title:STACY A. WHITE, Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA ANDERSON/GREENWOOD DIVISION

Date published: Jul 19, 2016

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 8:15-01873-MGL-JDA (D.S.C. Jul. 19, 2016)

Citing Cases

Dawson v. Saul

This is especially true "[w]here a lay witness's testimony merely repeats the allegations of a plaintiff's…