From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. City of West Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 18, 2021
2:20-cv-02383 MCE AC PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-02383 MCE AC PS

11-18-2021

ROBBIE D. WHITE, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

ALLISON CLAIRE, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. ECF Nos. 29, 32. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On October 6, 2021, defendants filed a motion to dismiss. ECF No. 30. The motion was set to be heard on December 1, 2021 via Zoom. ECF No. 36. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion.

Local Rule 230(c) provides that opposition to the granting of a motion must be filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Local Rule further provides that “[n]o party will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” In addition, Local Rule 230(i) provides that failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.”

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The motion hearing date of December 1, 2021 is CONTINUED to December 8, 2021, at 10:00 a.m. The hearing will be held via Zoom before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire. Please contact the Courtroom Deputy Jonathan Anderson by phone (916) 930-4199 or by email at janderson@caed.uscourts.gov one day prior to the scheduled motion hearing to receive the Zoom information.

2. Plaintiff shall file an opposition - or a Statement of Non-Opposition - to the motion, no later than November 24, 2021. Failure to file an opposition may be deemed a statement of non-opposition and will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

White v. City of West Sacramento

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Nov 18, 2021
2:20-cv-02383 MCE AC PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2021)
Case details for

White v. City of West Sacramento

Case Details

Full title:ROBBIE D. WHITE, Plaintiff, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Nov 18, 2021

Citations

2:20-cv-02383 MCE AC PS (E.D. Cal. Nov. 18, 2021)