From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. Cigna Grp. Ins.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Apr 26, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2181 (W.D. La. Apr. 26, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2181

04-26-2017

ESTHER HILL WHITE v. CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE, ET AL.


MAG. JUDGE KAREN L. HAYES

JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling, and for those additional reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [Doc. No. 44], which this Court finds correct under the law,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Esther Hill White's petition for benefits [Doc. No. 1] is DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

MONROE, LOUISIANA, this 26th day of April, 2017.

/s/ _________

ROBERT G. JAMES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

White v. Cigna Grp. Ins.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION
Apr 26, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2181 (W.D. La. Apr. 26, 2017)
Case details for

White v. Cigna Grp. Ins.

Case Details

Full title:ESTHER HILL WHITE v. CIGNA GROUP INSURANCE, ET AL.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION

Date published: Apr 26, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 15-2181 (W.D. La. Apr. 26, 2017)