Opinion
Civil Action No. 09-cv-04353
08-17-2011
ORDER
Now, this 16th day of August, 2011, upon consideration of the following documents:
(1) Motion of Defendants for Summary Judgment filed April 7, 2011 (Document 33); together withand for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Opinion,
Defendants' Brief in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment, which brief was filed April 7, 2011 (Document 33-1); and(2) Plaintiff's Brief in Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, which brief was filed April 28, 2011 (Document 35); and
Defendants' Statement of Undisputed Material Facts filed April 7, 2011 (Document 33-23);
(3) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment filed April 14, 2011 (Document 34); together with
Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law in Support of His Motion for Summary Judgment, which memorandum was filed April 14, 2011 (Document 34);(4) Defendants' Brief in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion For Summary Judgment,
which brief was filed May 4, 2011 (Document 36-1); together with
Defendants' Response to Plaintiff's Material Facts for Summary Judgment, which response was filed May 4, 2011 (Document 36); and(5) Amended Complaint filed October 22, 2010 (Document 19);
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion of Defendants for Summary Judgment is granted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is denied.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants Jack Brommer, Borough of Columbia and Matthew Leddy and against plaintiff Brian White on plaintiff's Amended Complaint.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.
BY THE COURT:
James Knoll Gardner
United States District Judge