From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White v. BMW of Seattle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 31, 2012
3:12-CV-1365-BR (D. Or. Jul. 31, 2012)

Opinion

3:12-CV-1365-BR

07-31-2012

DONALD L. WHITE, Plaintiff, v. BMW OF SEATTLE dba LITHIA OF SEATTLE, Defendant.


ORDER

BROWN, Judge.

The Court acknowledges receipt of Plaintiff Donald L. White's Complaint. The Court notes Plaintiff and Defendant BMW of Seattle dba Lithia of Seattle both appear to be residents of Seattle, Washington, and the Complaint does not reflect Defendant has any relationship with the District of Oregon.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 1931(b),

"[a] civil action may be brought in—
(1) a judicial district in which any defendant
resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located.
Thus, if this matter is to proceed in a United States District Court, the Western District of Washington appears to be the proper venue.

Plaintiff may show cause in writing no later than August 17, 2012, as to why this matter should not be prosecuted in the Western District of Washington rather than in the District of Oregon. If Plaintiff does not show cause in writing by August 17, 2012, or if the Court finds any stated cause is not sufficient to establish the proper venue is the District of Oregon, the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to transfer this action to the Western District of Washington.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________

ANNA J. BROWN

United States District Judge


Summaries of

White v. BMW of Seattle

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON
Jul 31, 2012
3:12-CV-1365-BR (D. Or. Jul. 31, 2012)
Case details for

White v. BMW of Seattle

Case Details

Full title:DONALD L. WHITE, Plaintiff, v. BMW OF SEATTLE dba LITHIA OF SEATTLE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON

Date published: Jul 31, 2012

Citations

3:12-CV-1365-BR (D. Or. Jul. 31, 2012)