Opinion
No. CV 10-032-TUC-FRZ (CRP)
03-30-2012
ORDER
Plaintiff Cheryl Dianne White filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) of the Social Security Act for judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, denying her application for Social Security disability benefits.
This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge for all pretrial proceedings and report and recommendation in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LRCiv 72.1 and LRCiv 72.2, Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Arizona.
On February 21, 2012, Magistrate Judge Charles R. Pyle issued his Report and Recommendation, recommending that the District Court, after its independent review of the record herein, reverse the decision of the Commissioner, based on the finding of legal error, and remand this case for an award of benefits.
The Report and Recommendation provides a thorough factual background and medical history and an in-depth legal analysis of the claims under the applicable legal standards therein.
The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that they may file written objections within fourteen (14) days from the date of service of a copy of the Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Rules 72(b) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
No objections were filed.
The Court finds, after consideration of all matters presented and an independent review of the record herein, that the findings of the Magistrate Judge as set forth in the Report and Recommendation, shall be accepted and adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Pyle's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 25) is hereby ACCEPTED and ADOPTED as the findings of fact and conclusions of law by this Court;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's claim for benefits is REMANDED to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for an award of benefits in accordance with the Report and Recommendation;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment be entered accordingly.
____________
Frank R. Zapata
Senior United States District Judge