From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White River Vill., LLP v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 12, 2014
Civil Action No. 08-cv-00248-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Mar. 12, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-00248-REB-MEH C/w Civil Action No. 08-cv-00359-REB-MEH

03-12-2014

WHITE RIVER VILLAGE, LLP, and WHITE RIVER TOWNHOMES, LLC Plaintiff, v. FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a Maryland corporation, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Counter Defendant, and HEPWORTH-PAWLAK GEOTECHNICAL, INC., a Colorado Corporation, Consolidated Defendant, v. COOKEY'S MECHANICAL, INC., Third-Party Defendant/Counter Claimant/Cross Claimant/ Counter Defendant, S & S JOINT VENTURE, Third-Party Defendant/Cross Defendant/Counter Claimant, JONATHAN REED & ASSOCIATES, INC., CLASS CONSTRUCTION, INC., BELLAVISTA BUILDERS, CRUZAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, RENTERIA ROOFING, EC CONTRACTORS, LLC, M.M. SKYLINE CONTRACTING, INC., a/k/a Skyline Contracting, DEKKER/PERICH/SABATINI, LTD., Third-Party Defendants.


Judge Robert E. Blackburn

AMENDED ORDER CONFIRMING ARBITRATION AWARD

Blackburn, J.

This matter is before me on the following: (1) the Motion To Confirm Arbitration Award and To Stay Enforcement of the Judgment [#418] field May 18, 2012; and (2) Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland's Supplemental Motion Regarding Confirmation of Arbitration Award [#426] filed January 29, 2013. Both motions generated responses [#421 & #428] and replies [#424 & #429]. I grant the motions in part and deny them in part.

"[#418]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.

This amended order changes the terms of the original Order Confirming Arbitration Award [#431] filed March 25, 2013, in one way. This amended order omits all provisions included in the original Order Confirming Arbitration Award [#431] which state that third-party defendant, Jonathan Reed & Associates, Inc., shall be jointly and severally liable for all damages and interest awarded by the arbitration panel to defendant Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland against the plaintiffs, White River Village, LLP and White River Townhomes, LLC. Otherwise, the terms of this amended order are the same as those included in the original Order Confirming Arbitration Award [#431]. The reasons for this amendment are explained in a separate order entered concurrently with this order.

I. JURISDICTION

I have jurisdiction over this case under 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity).

II. ANALYSIS

On March 23, 2009, I entered an order [#301] directing the parties to arbitrate the counterclaims and third-party claims of defendant/third-party plaintiff, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (F&D). That arbitration is complete. It resolved the majority of the remaining factual issues and claims in this case. Thus, only a few unresolved claims asserted by the plaintiffs remain.

In their motions, F&D and plaintiffs, White River Village and White River Townhomes (collectively White River), seek confirmation of the arbitration award. The arbitration covered also F&D's third party claims against Jonathan Reed & Associates, Inc. The arbitration panel found that Jonathan Reed & Associates, Inc. is not liable to F&D on any of its claims. White River and Jonathan Reed & Associates, Inc. do not object to the inclusion of Jonathan Reed & Associates, Inc. in this confirmation order.

A federal court should confirm an arbitrator's award "unless the award is vacated, modified, or corrected as prescribed in sections 10 and 11 of" the FAA. 9 U.S.C. § 9. Any party to the arbitration may apply to vacate the arbitration award where the arbitrators exceeded their powers. See id. § 10. Nevertheless, "the standard of review of arbitral awards is among the narrowest known to law." Brown v. Coleman Co., 220 F.3d 1180, 1182 (10th Cir. 2000), cert. denied, 121 S.Ct. 1191 (2001). "Once an arbitration award is entered, the finality of arbitration weighs heavily in its favor and cannot be upset except under exceptional circumstances." Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Public Service Co. of Oklahoma, 636 F.3d 562, 567 (10th Cir. 2010) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).

Here, there is no dispute that the arbitration award should be confirmed. Ultimately, the terms of the arbitration award will provide many of the terms for the final judgment entered in this case. However, some claims remain pending in this case. Generally, it is not appropriate to enter judgment in a case before all claims against all parties have been resolved. FED. R. CIV. P. 54. The special circumstances for entry of judgment as to some, but not all, claims and parties have not been established in this case. Therefore, I confirm the award, but await final resolution of all claims before entering judgment. In its motion, White River seeks a stay of enforcement of any judgment entered based on the arbitration award. Given the circumstances of this case, I deny that specific request as moot.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:

1. That the Motion To Confirm Arbitration Award and To Stay Enforcement of the Judgment [#418] field May 18, 2012, is GRANTED on the terms stated in this order;

2. That Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland's Supplemental Motion Regarding Confirmation of Arbitration Award [#426] filed January 29, 2013, is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part on the terms stated in this order;

3. That the request of White River for a stay of any judgment based on the arbitration award is DENIED as moot;

4. That the Final Award of the American Arbitration Association ("AAA") in Arbitration No. 77 110 Y 00092 08 HLT, executed on February 1, 2012, served on February 9, 2012, and attached as Exhibit A, is CONFIRMED;

5. That White River Village, LLP SHALL PAY Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland (F&D) the principal amount of $3,250,785.43, plus post-award interest on this amount at the rate of $2,183.53 per diem from February 1, 2012, until the date of the entry of judgment on the arbitration award (collectively, the "Total Confirmed Award Against WRV");

6. That after the entry of judgment on the arbitration award, interest on the Total Confirmed Award Against WRV SHALL ACCRUE at the rate designated in 28 U.S.C. §1961 (the "Federal Rate");

7. That interest SHALL ACCRUE at the Federal Rate and continue to be assessed against White River Village, LLP until the judgment entered under paragraph 5, supra., is satisfied by White River Village, LLP;

8. That White River Townhomes, LLC SHALL PAY F&D the principal amount of $1,493,193.38, plus post-award interest on this amount at the rate of $935.80 per diem from February 1, 2012, until the date of the entry of judgment on the arbitration award (collectively, the "Total Confirmed Award Against WRT");

9. That after the entry of judgment on the arbitration award, interest on the Total Confirmed Award Against WRT SHALL ACCRUE at the Federal Rate; and

10. That interest SHALL ACCRUE at the Federal Rate and continue to be assessed against White River Townhomes, LLC until the judgment entered under paragraph 8, supra., is satisfied by White River Townhomes, LLC.

Dated March 12, 2014, at Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

__________

Robert E. Blackburn

United States District Judge


Summaries of

White River Vill., LLP v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Mar 12, 2014
Civil Action No. 08-cv-00248-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Mar. 12, 2014)
Case details for

White River Vill., LLP v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md.

Case Details

Full title:WHITE RIVER VILLAGE, LLP, and WHITE RIVER TOWNHOMES, LLC Plaintiff, v…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Mar 12, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-cv-00248-REB-MEH (D. Colo. Mar. 12, 2014)