From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

White River Vill., LLP v. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 10, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-cv-00248-REB-BNB, (Consolidated with (08-cv-00359-REB-BNB) (D. Colo. Dec. 10, 2008)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-cv-00248-REB-BNB, (Consolidated with (08-cv-00359-REB-BNB).

December 10, 2008


ORDER


This matter arises on the following:

(1) Cookey's Mechanical's Motion for Leave to Designate Non-Parties and Request for Extension of Time to Designate Same [Doc. # 178, filed 11/19/2008] (the "Motion for Extension"); and

(2) Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland's Motion for Protective Order [Doc. # 197, filed 12/5/2008] (the "Motion for Protective Order").

I made rulings on each of the motions at the supplemental scheduling conference held today, and those oral rulings are incorporated here. In summary and for the reasons stated on the record today:

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Extension is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Protective Order is DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

White River Vill., LLP v. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Dec 10, 2008
Civil Action No. 08-cv-00248-REB-BNB, (Consolidated with (08-cv-00359-REB-BNB) (D. Colo. Dec. 10, 2008)
Case details for

White River Vill., LLP v. Hepworth-Pawlak Geotechnical

Case Details

Full title:WHITE RIVER VILLAGE, LLP, and WHITE RIVER TOWNHOMES, L.L.C., Plaintiffs…

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Dec 10, 2008

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-cv-00248-REB-BNB, (Consolidated with (08-cv-00359-REB-BNB) (D. Colo. Dec. 10, 2008)