From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitchard v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 27, 2013
132 So. 3d 223 (Fla. 2013)

Opinion

No. SC12–1814.

2013-12-27

Robert Lee WHITCHARD, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).


Because a writ of mandamus will not be issued where to do so would prove unavailing or compliance with it would be nugatory or without beneficial results to the petitioner, the petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See State ex rel. Ostroff v. Pearson, 61 So.2d 325 (Fla.1952); Campbell v. State ex rel. Garret, 183 So. 340 (Fla.1938); see also State ex rel. Bergin v. Dunne, 71 So.2d 746 (Fla.1954).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and PERRY, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Whitchard v. State

Supreme Court of Florida.
Dec 27, 2013
132 So. 3d 223 (Fla. 2013)
Case details for

Whitchard v. State

Case Details

Full title:Robert Lee WHITCHARD, Petitioner(s) v. STATE of Florida, Respondent(s).

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Dec 27, 2013

Citations

132 So. 3d 223 (Fla. 2013)