Opinion
Modeste v. Public Utilities Commission, ante, p. 453, reaffirmed and followed.
Argued April 12th, 1922
Decided June 3d 1922.
APPEAL by the plaintiff from an order of the Public Utilities Commission denying the plaintiff a certificate to operate a jitney from New Haven to Waterbury over a specified route, and from New Haven to Madison over a specified route, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County where, after a hearing before Keeler, J., the appeal was dismissed, from which the plaintiff appealed. No error.
George W. Crawford, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Seth W. Baldwin, for the appellee (defendant Connecticut Company).
S. Fred Wetzler, with whom was Samuel A. Persky, for the appellee (defendant Public Utilities Commission).
This appeal presents the same facts and rulings that appear in the case of Modeste v. Public Utilities Commission, ante, p. 453, and therefore falls within the same rulings as to the law that are set forth in the opinion in that case.