From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitby v. Neurologist

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Mar 8, 2019
CIV. NO. 1:19-cv-00085 LEK-KJM (D. Haw. Mar. 8, 2019)

Opinion

CIV. NO. 1:19-cv-00085 LEK-KJM

03-08-2019

BRYANT WHITBY, #A0715868, Plaintiff, v. STRAUB NEUROLOGIST, JAMES W. PIERCE, Defendants


ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT AND DENYING IN FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION

Before the court are pro se Plaintiff Bryant Whitby's prisoner civil rights Complaint and Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by a Prisoner (IFP Application). ECF Nos. 1-2. Whitby is incarcerated at the Halawa Correctional Facility (HCF).

Whitby's Complaint is unsigned and provides no information regarding his claims against Straub Neurologist or James W. Pierce, beyond his cryptic jurisdictional statement, "Parkinson's Disease Medication." Compl., ECF No. 1, PageID #1. The Complaint is otherwise blank.

Whitby's IFP Application, although signed, is incomplete. Whitby submits only the first page of the IFP Application, and therefore has neither consented to deduction of funds from his prison account nor shown the preceding six month balances in his prison account, as required under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2).

As filed, Whitby's pleadings and IFP Application are completely inadequate to allow the court to determine whether Whitby can state a colorable claim for relief against the named Defendants and whether Whitby is indigent and eligible to proceed in forma pauperis. As such, the Complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend and the IFP Application is DENIED.

CONCLUSION

(1) Whitby's Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Whitby is directed to file a signed, amended complaint on or before March 29, 2019. Whitby's amended pleading must adequately describe his claims, explain why he believes Defendants are legally responsible for such claims, explain this court's jurisdiction for his claims, and set forth an explicit request for relief. Whitby should not refer to cases or statutes to support his claims, but must simply and clearly explain what happened, when it happened, who is allegedly responsible for what happened, and why he has commenced this action in the this federal court. The amended complaint must be submitted on the court's prisoner civil rights complaint form and all questions on the form should be answered.

IN THE ALTERNATIVE, Whitby may voluntarily dismiss this action in writing on or before March 29, 2019. If Whitby does so, this action will be dismissed without prejudice and he will incur no fees or costs for this action.

(2) Whitby's IFP Application is DENIED without prejudice.

(3) The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send Whitby a blank prisoner civil rights complaint form and Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis as a Prisoner form, so that he may comply with this Order if he decides to proceed with this suit rather than voluntarily dismiss this action.

(4) If Whitby fails to timely comply with this order and submit an amended complaint and IFP Application, this suit may be AUTOMATICALLY DISMISSED without further notice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 8, 2019.

/s/ Leslie E. Kobayashi

Leslie E. Kobayashi

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Whitby v. Neurologist

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII
Mar 8, 2019
CIV. NO. 1:19-cv-00085 LEK-KJM (D. Haw. Mar. 8, 2019)
Case details for

Whitby v. Neurologist

Case Details

Full title:BRYANT WHITBY, #A0715868, Plaintiff, v. STRAUB NEUROLOGIST, JAMES W…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF HAWAII

Date published: Mar 8, 2019

Citations

CIV. NO. 1:19-cv-00085 LEK-KJM (D. Haw. Mar. 8, 2019)