From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitaker v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jul 6, 2018
246 So. 3d 1299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 5D18–925

07-06-2018

Gregory WHITAKER, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Gregory Whitaker, Live Oak, pro se. No Appearance for Appellee.


Gregory Whitaker, Live Oak, pro se.

No Appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Gregory Whitaker, appeals the summary denial of his motion pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. In his motion, Appellant alleged, inter alia , that trial counsel was ineffective because (1) counsel failed to take any depositions or otherwise "look into [Appellant's] case," and (2) Appellant informed counsel that he was sick on the morning of trial and that he was therefore unable to think clearly.

Although these claims were facially insufficient as alleged, Appellant was not given an opportunity to amend his claims. See Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850(f). Therefore, we reverse as to these two claims with instructions that the trial court give Appellant an opportunity to amend. We otherwise affirm.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Whitaker v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
Jul 6, 2018
246 So. 3d 1299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)
Case details for

Whitaker v. State

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY WHITAKER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Date published: Jul 6, 2018

Citations

246 So. 3d 1299 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2018)