Opinion
Case No. CV 19-6583-GW-SKx
04-29-2020
Brian Whitaker, Plaintiff, v Starbucks Corporation, a Washington Corporation; and Does 1-10, Defendants.
ROBERT W. CONTI, Bar No. 137307 rconti@littler.com CHARLES CANNIZZARO, Bar No. 280895 ccannizzaro@littler.com ASHLEY D. STEIN, Bar No. 305094 adstein@littler.com LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. 2050 Main Street Suite 900 Irvine, CA 92614 Telephone: 949.705.3000 Facsimile: 949.724.1201 Attorneys for Defendant STARBUCKS CORPORATION D/B/A STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY
ROBERT W. CONTI, Bar No. 137307
rconti@littler.com
CHARLES CANNIZZARO, Bar No. 280895
ccannizzaro@littler.com
ASHLEY D. STEIN, Bar No. 305094
adstein@littler.com
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
2050 Main Street
Suite 900
Irvine, CA 92614
Telephone: 949.705.3000
Facsimile: 949.724.1201 Attorneys for Defendant
STARBUCKS CORPORATION D/B/A
STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY
JUDGMENT GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
The Motion for Summary Judgment ("Motion") of Defendant STARBUCKS CORPORATION D/B/A STARBUCKS COFFEE COMPANY ("Defendant") came on for hearing on April 23, 2020, the Honorable George H. Wu, presiding.
The Court, having considered the evidence proffered in support of and in opposition to Defendants' Motion, having read and considered the supporting, opposition, and reply points and authorities, and good cause appearing therefore,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and JUDGMENT is hereby entered in favor of Defendant on all claims asserted by Plaintiff as follows:
Plaintiff's claim for violation of the ADA as to dining tables is moot, and thus this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this claim.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 29, 2020
/s/_________
HON. GEORGE H. WU
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE