From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Whitaker v. Kharsa

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 11, 2022
21-cv-06445-TLT (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)

Opinion

21-cv-06445-TLT

10-11-2022

BRIAN WHITAKER, Plaintiff, v. MAZEN KHARSA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ADA CLAIM WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND DECLINING SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION OVER UNRUH ACT CLAIM; JUDGMENT RE: DKT. NO. 30

TRINA L. THOMPSON, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed an indication of mootness of his Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) claim for injunctive relief. (Dkt. No. 30.) Plaintiff also indicates that he has no objection to the Court declining supplemental jurisdiction over his remaining Unruh Act claim. Id.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's ADA claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. With no objection from Plaintiff, the Court DECLINES supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining Unruh Act claim, which is DISMISSED without prejudice. See 28 USC § 1367(c)(3).

Because all claims have been dismissed without prejudice, it is hereby ordered and adjudged that Plaintiff shall take nothing by this action and that Judgment is entered for Defendants and against Plaintiff. The Clerk shall close the case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Whitaker v. Kharsa

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Oct 11, 2022
21-cv-06445-TLT (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)
Case details for

Whitaker v. Kharsa

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN WHITAKER, Plaintiff, v. MAZEN KHARSA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Oct 11, 2022

Citations

21-cv-06445-TLT (N.D. Cal. Oct. 11, 2022)